Spencer Donnelly, who goes by TheRussianBadger on YouTube, has cultivated an audience of nearly 2.7 million subscribers for his gaming videos. For years, business has been rosy. YouTube shares a percentage of the ad revenue on each of his videos, and the money is good enough that playing videogames on camera has become a full-time job. A few years ago, he even incorporated The Russian Badger, legitimizing his YouTubing business. The only problem: No bank would give him a serious credit card.
“Imagine that you’re making $2 or $3 million a year and they’re capping you at $20,000 a month,” says Donnelly, which was the best he could get from a traditional bank. When it came time to upgrade his gaming setup—a pricey but necessary expenditure—he found himself buying components in parts and then paying off the card to cycle through his own credit.
Donnelly, like many of the creators who make their living on platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and Twitch, has long felt shunned by institutions that don’t understand that his lifestyle is also his business. That makes him the target market for Karat, a new startup offering financial services to the influencer set.
Karat’s first product is the Karat Black Card, designed specifically for influencers, with credit lines starting at $50,000. Its perks can be customized (gamers get cash back on streaming services; beauty influencers get perks for product purchases), and the credit limits are determined by an influencer’s social metrics, revenue streams, and cash in hand. To issue the cards, Karat has partnered with the payments company Stripe, which launched its own corporate card late last year. For now, Karat wants to be the flashy card in every influencer’s wallet. But eventually, the startup could become a one-stop shop for a creator’s business needs.
Before its official launch, Karat piloted the black card with a small group of successful creators like Donnelly, many with similar stories of financial frustration. “We actually have clients who make millions of dollars, and the bank had given them a card with a $10,000 credit limit,” says Eric Wei, Karat’s cofounder. “We’ve met creators who have over $100,000 in a PayPal account—they’re not even using a bank.” A former product manager at Instagram, Wei had been astounded to see how much money some creators were making on the platform. He was even more shocked to see how many of those creators were turned away from financial products like credit cards and mortgages.
“The traditional banking system is messed up,” says Will Kim, the other cofounder, who previously worked in finance. “It’s overlooking these vast swaths of underserved groups. That’s where we were like, ‘Wait. This is a massive opportunity.’”
The influencer market will be, by some estimates, worth close to $15 billion in just a few years, with hundreds of thousands of people earning sizable income from viral videos and social posts. By Karat’s own count, there are over a million professional full-time creators globally who earn at least $80,000 a year—but many of them have trouble accessing the same resources as someone with a more traditional small business. Part of the difficulty in loaning to influencers is that their business models vary so much. Influencer income can seem, to a bank, unreliable; the money can vary wildly from month to month, and it can come from a variety of different sources, from sponsorship deals and shares of ad revenue to subscriptions and donations from fans. That makes it more difficult for banks to gauge what sort of credit they should offer to an individual creator, and to compare one creator to another. “It’s hilarious seeing traditional institutions work with YouTubers,” Donnelly says. “The easiest way to put it is that everybody thinks you’re a drug dealer.”
To develop Karat’s underwriting capabilities, Wei and Kim had to collect data on how various influencers were making money. In order to apply for the card, creators submit social media metrics and income information. (Karat’s website says it will “prioritize creators with verified followings of at least 100K or those referred by our partners.”) But “it’s not as simple as millions of followers equals millions of dollars,” says Kim. “Social stats are good indicators, but they’re not the full picture.”
Each social media platform has different options for monetizing an audience, and some are more lucrative than others. “I’d rather have a million followers on YouTube than 10 million on TikTok,” says Wei, since YouTubers can get money from both ad revenue and channel subscriptions, while TikTok has no direct monetization options and makes it difficult to follow specific creators. Engagement is also critical. An influencer with 1 million followers and 10 percent engagement will do better than another with 10 million followers and 1 percent engagement, because engagement doesn’t scale linearly. In gauging creditworthiness, Karat also looks for signals that the creator has “professionalized” (incorporating their business, responding to emails on time) and the ways they have diversified their revenue (affiliate links, AdSense, sponsorships, subscriptions, and merchandising). It’s essential to see that they’re not mono-platform, Kim says, since “creators who are too reliant on any one platform struggle when something goes wrong with that platform.”